Archive | February, 2012

Matt Kenney: The Founder of the Law banning Niqaab at Citizenship Oath

29 Feb

Muslim Canadian Congress on Niqaab

29 Feb

More like the Kufr Canadian Congress lool

CAIR-CAN on Niqaab-Ihsaan Gardee

29 Feb

Malaysian Niqabi

29 Feb

Republicans don’t want to apologize for Qur’an burning

28 Feb

Obama’s Apology for Quran Burning a Mistake, Santorum Says

  • rick santorum
    (Photo: Reuters/Chris Keane)
    U.S. Republican presidential candidate and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum speaks during the Faith and Freedom Prayer Breakfast in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina January 15, 2012.

Rick Santorum joined other Republican presidential hopefuls in denouncing President Barack Obama‘s apology for the burning of Qurans in Afghanistan, saying it could be misinterpreted as an admission of guilt for a “deliberate act.”

“There was nothing deliberately done wrong here,” former Penn. Sen. Santorum said during an interview with ABC’s “This Week” show Sunday, referring to Obama’s apology for the unintentional burning of Qurans at a U.S. base in Kabul last week that resulted in the killing of over 30 people, including four American soldiers.

Two American officers were shot dead inside Afghanistan’s heavily guarded interior ministry Saturday, and two U.S. soldiers were killed Thursday, the day Obama apologized in a letter to Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

“This (the Quran burning) was something that happened as a mistake. Killing Americans in uniform is not a mistake. It was something that [was] deliberate,” added Santorum, the current GOP front-runner.

Last Tuesday, Afghan workers at the Bagram air base discovered copies of the Quran dumped into a pit where trash is burned. The workers reportedly salvaged the Islamic holy books to show to local leaders.

Santorum was interviewed also by NBC’s “Meet the Press” show Sunday. “The response needs to be apologized for by Karzai and the Afghan people for attacking and killing our men and women in uniform and overreacting to this inadvertent mistake,” Santorum told NBC. “That is the real crime here, not what our soldiers did.”

Obama’s apology, he said, suggests that there was blame “in the sense of doing a deliberate act.” The president, he added, should have said “this was inadvertent, this was a mistake. There was no deliberate act. There was no meant of disrespect – this is something that occurred that shouldn’t have occurred, but it was an accident … But to apologize, I think, lends credibility that somehow or another that it was more than that.”

Santorum’s rival, Mitt Romney, also flayed Obama’s apology. “With regards to the apology, I think for a lot of people, it sticks in their throat,” the former Massachusetts governor told Fox News Sunday. “The idea that we are there, having lost thousands of individuals through casualty and death – we’ve made an enormous contribution to help the people there achieve freedom, and for us to be apologizing at a time like this is something which is very difficult for the American people to countenance.”

Earlier, on Saturday, GOP candidate Newt Gingrich said Obama’s apology amounted to appeasement. “There doesn’t seem to be any request for an apology from Karzai,” he told Fox News.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defended Obama. “I find it somewhat troubling that our politicswould enflame such a dangerous situation in Afghanistan,” she told CNN on Sunday. “It was the right thing to do to have our president on record as saying this was not intentional, we deeply regret it … We are hoping that voices inside Afghanistan will join that of President Karzai and others in speaking out to try to calm the situation … It is out of hand and it needs to stop.”

President Karzai appealed for calm on Sunday, but he has also called for punishment of those responsible for the burning of Qurans.

NATO’s General John Allen has recalled all International Security Assistance Force personnel working in ministries in and around Kabul “for obvious force protection reasons.”

Qur’an Burning in Afghanistan

27 Feb

The Legacy of the Prophet saw

26 Feb

The haram practice of mut’ah

26 Feb

Is Abortion Haram?-Zakir Naik

21 Feb

Wife taking Husband`s surname

18 Feb

Why a woman should not take her husband?s surname? Is it jaiz to get husband?s surname.

In Islam what are the basic rules & regulation for muslim women to adopt from her father Or her husband. Why a woman should not take her husband?s surname? It is the commen practice specially in Pakistan that Father or Husband try to implement his name with his family womens? Please inform in brief .Please remember in pray.

Answer 11487


Email this question to yourself or a friend

Tell a friend

Show a printer friendly version of this question
Printable Copy

Search through the Fatwa Q & A's
Search Q & A’s 

Browse through the Fatwa Q & A's
View Q & A’s 

Ask Imam your question, online
Ask a Question 

While the normal practice in Islam is that a person mentioned their name as “so and so” the son of “so and so” from “so and so” family, clan or area. In today’s society, the mention of the Fathers name has been left out, thus a person is addressed by his/her forename and surname, the surname generally being the name of the family or area. It is taken to be normal that before marriage a female takes the surname of her father and after marriage that of her husband. Thus, it will be perfectly permissible for a woman to take her husbands surname, especially as there are many other factors demanding it, viz.

1. Certain countries don’t regard the children as legitimate if the parents don’t have corresponding surnames

2. It is law in certain countries that in order for a couple to be legally registered as married, the wife has to adopt her husbands surname in all legal documents.

3. In order to prove the man travelling with you for Haj or Umra to be your husband and Wali, the Saudi authorities sometimes demand that the surname on both passports tally.

4. In our society, the women who don’t take the surnames of their husbands are those who want to show themselves as liberated, equal to and liberated from their husbands. Thus by not adopting the husbands surname, it could be misconstrued that she is one of them.

Under these circumstances, it would be preferred for the woman to take the surname of her husband. If both her father and husband insist on her taking their surname than obedience to the husband would be given priority, otherwise a possible solution could be to take the fathers name or surname as a middle name and keep the husbands surname as her surname.

and Allah Ta’ala Knows Best

Mufti Ebrahim Desai